Skip to content
← Back to News

regulation · October 1, 2026

By Joe Jurczyk, Editor

Bombay High Court orders takedown of AI deepfakes misusing Samantha Ruth Prabhu's name, image and voice

An interim order in a John Doe suit directs the removal of content misusing the actress's name, image and voice, including AI deepfakes, on personality-rights grounds.

personality rights
india
litigation
voice cloning

The Bombay High Court passed an interim order in Samantha Ruth Prabhu v. John Doe & Ors. directing the takedown of content found to misuse the actress's name, image and voice, including AI deepfakes and derogatory material. The suit was filed seeking protection of her personality rights, and the defendants are unnamed John Doe parties. Bar & Bench reported the order on 1 October 2026. It did not publish the order text, a case number, or the specific grounds the court relied on.

Why it matters for digital humans: India has become the most active jurisdiction for likeness injunctions, and the pattern matters more than any individual case: a John Doe order aimed at unidentified uploaders, covering voice alongside face, granted on personality rights rather than copyright. For avatar platforms and hosts, the practical exposure is that these orders reach intermediaries, and voice is now routinely treated as part of the protected persona rather than a separate question. Details here are thin, and reporting on Indian interim orders often precedes the written order by weeks, so the scope is worth re-checking before relying on it.